Society of Payment Security Professionals Forum  

Go Back   Society of Payment Security Professionals Forum > Discussion Groups > PCI DSS Q&A

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-28-2010, 01:48 AM
jbhall56's Avatar
jbhall56 jbhall56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cahenninger View Post
I believe Manukabay has hit the nail on the head. Now that said, I think there is a lot of confusion about what it takes to qualify for SAQ C. the statement that " the device does not connect to anything else on the network" is telling. but most forget about this. In other words, the only realy way to qualify for SAQ C is to have a simple POS card swipe on a single connection to the Internet. No domains or other devices on the same segment. Most networks have more than one device.
Well said. But you can have a string of POS devices on the same network and still meet the requirements of SAQ C.

This is an example of where we frequently see SAQ C go wrong. A lot of restaurant franchisees that operate three or more locations typically have very sophisticated systems that not only run the POS, but also the back office accounting and inventory management, employee time keeping, etc. The problem is that these integrated solutions (usually only two servers, a primary and a backup) not only connect to the card processor, but also connect to master servers back at the franchisee's headquarters. 9 times out of 10, these are the people that want to fill out the SAQ C under the mistaken belief that their integrated solution meets the qualifications for SAQ C.

This is where the acquiring bank or the card processor need to step up and explain that this is not the intent of SAQ C. However, because the majority of the card processors and acquiring banks have limited, if any, knowledge regarding the SAQs, let alone the full PCI DSS, they just nod their heads in agreement and let the franchisee fill out whatever SAQ they ask to fill out. Then when a breach occurs, all hell breaks loose because the franchisee is being fined by the people that gave them the bad advice.

The correct SAQ for our example above is to fill out SAQ D.
__________________
Jeff Hall, Director, Risk Advisory Services
RSM McGladrey Inc
801 Nicollet Mall, 11th Floor, West Tower
Minneapolis, MN 55402-2526
612 376 9280 - office
612 395 7280 - facsimile
www.mcgladrey.com

The views presented are those of the writer and are not necessarily those of RSM McGladrey Inc
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-26-2010, 01:23 PM
bhuebner bhuebner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cahenninger View Post
I believe Manukabay has hit the nail on the head. Now that said, I think there is a lot of confusion about what it takes to qualify for SAQ C. the statement that " the device does not connect to anything else on the network" is telling. but most forget about this. In other words, the only realy way to qualify for SAQ C is to have a simple POS card swipe on a single connection to the Internet. No domains or other devices on the same segment. Most networks have more than one device.
Most people concentrate on the storage of CHD for a SAQ C. They really forget about network connectivity. It is actually quite frustrating as customers don't agree with our assessment of their environment. Having been a former QSA for 4 years and now in a different market segment, we come up against competition in the sales process where the other vendor says they can do a SAQ C and here is the solution, at a lower cost. We contend they are a SAQ D, rightfully so, and our solution cost is higher.

The amount of misinformation out there is amazing. Unfortunately, smaller merchants often go with the lowest cost solution and trust the vendor that they have adequately scoped the solution for their environment. Come breach time, they will be unpleasantly surprised.
__________________
---------------------------
Blake Huebner - CISSP, QSA (now former), CPISM

Last edited by bhuebner; 08-26-2010 at 01:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Copyright (c) The Aegenis Group, Inc.